Arterial renarrowing less likely, with no increase in mortality on
long-term follow-up
CHICAGO, March 30 /PRNewswire/ -- Although drug-eluting stents have
become widely used for the treatment of stable coronary artery disease,
many cardiologists choose bare-metal stents for patients with heart attack,
or myocardial infarction (MI), citing conflicting data about the safety and
effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in this patient group. Such concerns
are being challenged by an analysis of a large Massachusetts database.
The analysis showed a significantly lower risk of arterial renarrowing,
or restenosis, among heart attack patients who were treated with
drug-eluting stents, with no increase in mortality, when compared to those
treated with bare-metal stents.
The study is being reported today in a Late-Breaking Clinical Trials
session at the SCAI Annual Scientific Sessions in Partnership with ACC i2
Summit (SCAI-ACCi2) in Chicago. SCAI-ACCi2 is a scientific meeting for
practicing cardiovascular interventionalists sponsored by the Society for
Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) in partnership with the
American College of Cardiology (ACC).
"This study confirms that the same benefits that drug-eluting stents
offer other patients in preventing restenosis of the coronary arteries are
still there for patients with MI, and there doesn't appear to be any
trade-off in increased risk of repeat MI or death," said Laura Mauri, MD,
MSC, an interventional cardiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital, an
assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School, and chief
scientific officer at the Harvard Clinical Research Institute, all in
Boston.
Cardiologists have had to decide which type of stent to use in heart
attack patients based on small randomized trials that didn't include
long-term follow-up and reported conflicting results. There have also been
concerns that, because heart attack patients are already prone to forming
blood clots in the coronary arteries, they might be at high risk for stent
thrombosis, or sudden clotting inside the stent, particularly a
drug-eluting stent.
To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting
stents, Dr. Mauri and her colleagues analyzed data from 7,216 patients who
underwent stenting for acute MI in Massachusetts, where hospitals are
required to submit data on all coronary interventions to a state database.
Of these, 4,016 patients were treated with a drug-eluting stent and 3,200
were treated with a bare-metal stent. To adjust for differences in baseline
risk, patients in the two groups were matched on up to 63 variables.
Researchers found that the two-year, risk-adjusted rate of
revascularization -- or the need for a repeat procedure to open the
coronary arteries as a result of renarrowing, or restenosis -- was
significantly lower in patients treated with drug-eluting stents when
compared with bare-metal stents (15.5 percent vs. 20.8 percent; p<0.001).
Mortality was 10.4 percent and 13.2 percent, respectively, in the two
groups (p=0.002), and repeat MI occurred in 9.5 percent and 11.0 percent,
respectively (p=0.08).
"These findings are reassuring," Dr. Mauri said. "Although neither
bare-metal stents nor drug-eluting stents were originally approved in the
setting of acute myocardial infarction, it is probably the most important
condition we treat with stents. I would feel comfortable considering
drug-eluting stents on the basis of these results -- with the caveats that
treated patients must be able to take antiplatelet therapy and that we
definitely want to see even longer-term follow-up."
The researchers plan to continue follow-up in Massachusetts and
re-examine the findings when more data are available.
Dr. Mauri will present the results of this study on Sunday, March 30 at
9:15 a.m. CDT in the Grand Ballroom, S100.
About SCAI
Headquartered in Washington, DC, the Society for Cardiovascular
Angiography and Interventions is a 4,000-member professional organization
representing invasive and interventional cardiologists in over 60 nations.
SCAI's mission is to promote excellence in invasive and interventional
cardiovascular medicine through physician education and representation, and
advancement of quality standards to enhance patient care. SCAI's annual
meeting has become the leading venue for education, discussion, and debate
about the latest developments in this dynamic medical specialty.
About ACC
The American College of Cardiology is leading the way to optimal
cardiovascular care and disease prevention. The College is a 34,000-member
nonprofit medical society and bestows the credential Fellow of the American
College of Cardiology upon physicians who meet its stringent
qualifications. The College is a leader in the formulation of health
policy, standards and guidelines, and is a staunch supporter of
cardiovascular research. The ACC provides professional education and
operates national registries for the measurement and improvement of quality
care.
See Also
- Advantages of Swimming
- Winter Hair care Routine
- Female Body Building Pictures
- How to buy Lipitor online?
Via: Healthcare
0 коментарі:
Post a Comment